Radiography Tech Salary

San Francisco vs Santa Monica: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between San Francisco, CA and Santa Monica, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$149,280
$71.78/hr
Santa Monica, CA
$116,421
$55.97/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASanta Monica, CA
Median Salary$149,280$116,421
Hourly Rate$71.78$55.97
Entry Level (P10)$94,740$80,900
25th Percentile$124,727$93,063
75th Percentile$178,582$141,917
Top Earner (P90)$186,153$168,486
Total Employed2,85020
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($149,280) and Santa Monica ($116,421) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.San FranciscoSanta MonicaMedian Salary$149,280$116,421Entry Level (P10)$94,740$80,900Top Earner (P90)$186,153$168,486US Median $84,348

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Santa Monica.

The salary gap between San Francisco and Santa Monica is $32,859 (28.22%). San Francisco's median is +76.98% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,413,Santa Monica spans $87,586. San Francisco has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$94,740
P25$124,727
Median$149,280
P75$178,582
P90 (Top)$186,153
Santa Monica
P10 (Entry)$80,900
P25$93,063
Median$116,421
P75$141,917
P90 (Top)$168,486

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($129,120 effective) pays 25.44% more than Santa Monica ($102,936 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $149,280
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $129,120
Santa Monica
Nominal: $116,421
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $102,936

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($149,280/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($186,153)
  • Larger job market (2,850 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $129,120)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Santa Monica if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in San Francisco grew 35.9% from 2019 to 2025, compared to -5.2% growth in Santa Monica over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+35.9%

$104,360 (2019) → $141,780 (2025)

Santa Monica, CA

+-5.2%

$116,598 (2024) → $110,572 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: San Francisco or Santa Monica?

San Francisco has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $149,280/year, compared to Santa Monica at $116,421/year — a difference of $32,859 (28.22%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and Santa Monica?

San Francisco radiologic technologist and technicians earn $71.78/hr while Santa Monica hygienists earn $55.97/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to Santa Monica as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and Santa Monica. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $129,120, Santa Monica = $102,936), job availability (2,850 vs 20 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in San Francisco vs Santa Monica?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $94,740 in San Francisco and $80,900 in Santa Monica. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov