Radiography Tech Salary

San Francisco vs San Mateo: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between San Francisco, CA and San Mateo, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$149,280
$71.78/hr
San Mateo, CA
$116,409
$55.96/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASan Mateo, CA
Median Salary$149,280$116,409
Hourly Rate$71.78$55.96
Entry Level (P10)$94,740$75,594
25th Percentile$124,727$96,241
75th Percentile$178,582$143,021
Top Earner (P90)$186,153$178,886
Total Employed2,85021
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($149,280) and San Mateo ($116,409) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.San FranciscoSan MateoMedian Salary$149,280$116,409Entry Level (P10)$94,740$75,594Top Earner (P90)$186,153$178,886US Median $84,348

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to San Mateo.

The salary gap between San Francisco and San Mateo is $32,871 (28.24%). San Francisco's median is +76.98% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,413,San Mateo spans $103,292. San Mateo has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced radiologic technologist and technicians.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$94,740
P25$124,727
Median$149,280
P75$178,582
P90 (Top)$186,153
San Mateo
P10 (Entry)$75,594
P25$96,241
Median$116,409
P75$143,021
P90 (Top)$178,886

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($129,120 effective) pays 25.45% more than San Mateo ($102,926 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $149,280
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $129,120
San Mateo
Nominal: $116,409
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $102,926

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($149,280/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($186,153)
  • Larger job market (2,850 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $129,120)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose San Mateo if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in San Francisco grew 35.9% from 2019 to 2025, compared to -5.2% growth in San Mateo over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+35.9%

$104,360 (2019) → $141,780 (2025)

San Mateo, CA

+-5.2%

$116,586 (2024) → $110,560 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: San Francisco or San Mateo?

San Francisco has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $149,280/year, compared to San Mateo at $116,409/year — a difference of $32,871 (28.24%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and San Mateo?

San Francisco radiologic technologist and technicians earn $71.78/hr while San Mateo hygienists earn $55.96/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to San Mateo as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and San Mateo. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $129,120, San Mateo = $102,926), job availability (2,850 vs 21 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in San Francisco vs San Mateo?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $94,740 in San Francisco and $75,594 in San Mateo. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov