Radiography Tech Salary

San Francisco vs San Luis Obispo: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between San Francisco, CA and San Luis Obispo, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$149,280
$71.78/hr
San Luis Obispo, CA
$109,154
$52.48/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASan Luis Obispo, CA
Median Salary$149,280$109,154
Hourly Rate$71.78$52.48
Entry Level (P10)$94,740$66,691
25th Percentile$124,727$83,316
75th Percentile$178,582$132,339
Top Earner (P90)$186,153$141,110
Total Employed2,85080
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($149,280) and San Luis Obispo ($109,154) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.San FranciscoSan Luis ObispoMedian Salary$149,280$109,154Entry Level (P10)$94,740$66,691Top Earner (P90)$186,153$141,110US Median $84,348

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to San Luis Obispo.

The salary gap between San Francisco and San Luis Obispo is $40,126 (36.76%). San Francisco's median is +76.98% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,413,San Luis Obispo spans $74,419. San Francisco has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$94,740
P25$124,727
Median$149,280
P75$178,582
P90 (Top)$186,153
San Luis Obispo
P10 (Entry)$66,691
P25$83,316
Median$109,154
P75$132,339
P90 (Top)$141,110

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($129,120 effective) pays 28.46% more than San Luis Obispo ($100,514 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $149,280
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $129,120
San Luis Obispo
Nominal: $109,154
CoL Index: 108.596
Adjusted: $100,514

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($149,280/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($186,153)
  • Larger job market (2,850 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $129,120)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose San Luis Obispo if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in San Francisco grew 35.9% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 40.7% growth in San Luis Obispo over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+35.9%

$104,360 (2019) → $141,780 (2025)

San Luis Obispo, CA

+40.7%

$73,690 (2019) → $103,670 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: San Francisco or San Luis Obispo?

San Francisco has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $149,280/year, compared to San Luis Obispo at $109,154/year — a difference of $40,126 (36.76%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and San Luis Obispo?

San Francisco radiologic technologist and technicians earn $71.78/hr while San Luis Obispo hygienists earn $52.48/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to San Luis Obispo as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and San Luis Obispo. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $129,120, San Luis Obispo = $100,514), job availability (2,850 vs 80 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in San Francisco vs San Luis Obispo?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $94,740 in San Francisco and $66,691 in San Luis Obispo. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov