Radiography Tech Salary

San Antonio vs Wichita Falls: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between San Antonio, TX and Wichita Falls, TX. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Antonio, TX
$82,200
$39.52/hr
Wichita Falls, TX
$64,490
$31.01/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Antonio, TXWichita Falls, TX
Median Salary$82,200$64,490
Hourly Rate$39.52$31.01
Entry Level (P10)$51,592$53,656
25th Percentile$66,227$59,036
75th Percentile$92,592$76,862
Top Earner (P90)$104,374$81,747
Total Employed1,63090
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Antonio ($82,200) and Wichita Falls ($64,490) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.San AntonioWichita FallsMedian Salary$82,200$64,490Entry Level (P10)$51,592$53,656Top Earner (P90)$104,374$81,747US Median $84,348

Verdict

San Antonio, TX offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Wichita Falls.

The salary gap between San Antonio and Wichita Falls is $17,710 (27.46%). San Antonio's median is -2.55% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Antonio spans $52,782,Wichita Falls spans $28,091. San Antonio has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

San Antonio
P10 (Entry)$51,592
P25$66,227
Median$82,200
P75$92,592
P90 (Top)$104,374
Wichita Falls
P10 (Entry)$53,656
P25$59,036
Median$64,490
P75$76,862
P90 (Top)$81,747

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Antonio ($86,786 effective) pays 20.46% more than Wichita Falls ($72,045 effective).

San Antonio
Nominal: $82,200
CoL Index: 94.716
Adjusted: $86,786
Wichita Falls
Nominal: $64,490
CoL Index: 89.513
Adjusted: $72,045

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Antonio if…

  • Higher median salary ($82,200/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($104,374)
  • Larger job market (1,630 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $86,786)
  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Choose Wichita Falls if…

  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in San Antonio grew 31.2% from 2020 to 2025, compared to 28.5% growth in Wichita Falls over the same period.

San Antonio, TX

+31.2%

$59,500 (2020) → $78,070 (2025)

Wichita Falls, TX

+28.5%

$47,650 (2019) → $61,250 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: San Antonio or Wichita Falls?

San Antonio has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $82,200/year, compared to Wichita Falls at $64,490/year — a difference of $17,710 (27.46%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Antonio and Wichita Falls?

San Antonio radiologic technologist and technicians earn $39.52/hr while Wichita Falls hygienists earn $31.01/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Antonio to Wichita Falls as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Antonio and Wichita Falls. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Antonio = $86,786, Wichita Falls = $72,045), job availability (1,630 vs 90 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in San Antonio vs Wichita Falls?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $51,592 in San Antonio and $53,656 in Wichita Falls. The Wichita Falls area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov