Radiography Tech Salary

Petaluma vs Riverside: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Petaluma, CA and Riverside, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Petaluma, CA
$143,421
$68.95/hr
Riverside, CA
$110,755
$53.25/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPetaluma, CARiverside, CA
Median Salary$143,421$110,755
Hourly Rate$68.95$53.25
Entry Level (P10)$104,288$75,777
25th Percentile$118,005$89,675
75th Percentile$178,079$135,077
Top Earner (P90)$213,527$141,036
Total Employed122,140
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Petaluma ($143,421) and Riverside ($110,755) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.PetalumaRiversideMedian Salary$143,421$110,755Entry Level (P10)$104,288$75,777Top Earner (P90)$213,527$141,036US Median $84,348

Verdict

Petaluma, CA offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Riverside.

The salary gap between Petaluma and Riverside is $32,666 (29.49%). Petaluma's median is +70.03% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Petaluma spans $109,239,Riverside spans $65,259. Petaluma has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Petaluma
P10 (Entry)$104,288
P25$118,005
Median$143,421
P75$178,079
P90 (Top)$213,527
Riverside
P10 (Entry)$75,777
P25$89,675
Median$110,755
P75$135,077
P90 (Top)$141,036

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Petaluma ($126,809 effective) pays 21.87% more than Riverside ($104,052 effective).

Petaluma
Nominal: $143,421
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $126,809
Riverside
Nominal: $110,755
CoL Index: 106.442
Adjusted: $104,052

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Petaluma if…

  • Higher median salary ($143,421/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($213,527)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $126,809)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Riverside if…

  • Larger job market (2,140 employed)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Petaluma grew 20.4% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 32.6% growth in Riverside over the same period.

Petaluma, CA

+20.4%

$113,117 (2024) → $136,215 (2025)

Riverside, CA

+32.6%

$79,330 (2019) → $105,190 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Petaluma or Riverside?

Petaluma has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $143,421/year, compared to Riverside at $110,755/year — a difference of $32,666 (29.49%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Petaluma and Riverside?

Petaluma radiologic technologist and technicians earn $68.95/hr while Riverside hygienists earn $53.25/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Petaluma to Riverside as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Petaluma and Riverside. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Petaluma = $126,809, Riverside = $104,052), job availability (12 vs 2,140 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Petaluma vs Riverside?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $104,288 in Petaluma and $75,777 in Riverside. The Petaluma area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov