Radiography Tech Salary

Los Angeles vs West Sacramento: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Los Angeles, CA and West Sacramento, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Los Angeles, CA
$113,745
$54.69/hr
West Sacramento, CA
$113,402
$54.52/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLos Angeles, CAWest Sacramento, CA
Median Salary$113,745$113,402
Hourly Rate$54.69$54.52
Entry Level (P10)$67,459$82,720
25th Percentile$91,992$93,850
75th Percentile$140,499$141,350
Top Earner (P90)$163,052$169,741
Total Employed6,4509
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Los Angeles ($113,745) and West Sacramento ($113,402) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.Los AngelesWest SacramentoMedian Salary$113,745$113,402Entry Level (P10)$67,459$82,720Top Earner (P90)$163,052$169,741US Median $84,348

Verdict

Los Angeles, CA offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to West Sacramento.

The salary gap between Los Angeles and West Sacramento is $343 (0.30%). Los Angeles's median is +34.85% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Los Angeles spans $95,593,West Sacramento spans $87,021. Los Angeles has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Los Angeles
P10 (Entry)$67,459
P25$91,992
Median$113,745
P75$140,499
P90 (Top)$163,052
West Sacramento
P10 (Entry)$82,720
P25$93,850
Median$113,402
P75$141,350
P90 (Top)$169,741

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, West Sacramento ($100,267 effective) pays 0.11% more than Los Angeles ($100,158 effective).

Los Angeles
Nominal: $113,745
CoL Index: 113.566
Adjusted: $100,158
West Sacramento
Nominal: $113,402
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $100,267

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Los Angeles if…

  • Higher median salary ($113,745/year)
  • Larger job market (6,450 employed)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose West Sacramento if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($169,741)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $100,267)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Los Angeles grew 31.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to -5.2% growth in West Sacramento over the same period.

Los Angeles, CA

+31.6%

$82,110 (2019) → $108,030 (2025)

West Sacramento, CA

+-5.2%

$113,573 (2024) → $107,704 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Los Angeles or West Sacramento?

Los Angeles has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $113,745/year, compared to West Sacramento at $113,402/year — a difference of $343 (0.30%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Los Angeles and West Sacramento?

Los Angeles radiologic technologist and technicians earn $54.69/hr while West Sacramento hygienists earn $54.52/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Los Angeles to West Sacramento as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Los Angeles and West Sacramento. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Los Angeles = $100,158, West Sacramento = $100,267), job availability (6,450 vs 9 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Los Angeles vs West Sacramento?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $67,459 in Los Angeles and $82,720 in West Sacramento. The West Sacramento area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov