Radiography Tech Salary

Hemet vs San Francisco: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Hemet, CA and San Francisco, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Hemet, CA
$115,454
$55.51/hr
San Francisco, CA
$149,280
$71.78/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHemet, CASan Francisco, CA
Median Salary$115,454$149,280
Hourly Rate$55.51$71.78
Entry Level (P10)$78,779$94,740
25th Percentile$91,115$124,727
75th Percentile$139,475$178,582
Top Earner (P90)$165,423$186,153
Total Employed142,850
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Hemet ($115,454) and San Francisco ($149,280) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.HemetSan FranciscoMedian Salary$115,454$149,280Entry Level (P10)$78,779$94,740Top Earner (P90)$165,423$186,153US Median $84,348

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Hemet.

The salary gap between Hemet and San Francisco is $33,826 (29.30%). San Francisco's median is +76.98% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Hemet spans $86,644,San Francisco spans $91,413. San Francisco has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced radiologic technologist and technicians.

Hemet
P10 (Entry)$78,779
P25$91,115
Median$115,454
P75$139,475
P90 (Top)$165,423
San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$94,740
P25$124,727
Median$149,280
P75$178,582
P90 (Top)$186,153

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($129,120 effective) pays 26.49% more than Hemet ($102,081 effective).

Hemet
Nominal: $115,454
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $102,081
San Francisco
Nominal: $149,280
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $129,120

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Hemet if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($149,280/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($186,153)
  • Larger job market (2,850 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $129,120)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Hemet grew -5.2% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 35.9% growth in San Francisco over the same period.

Hemet, CA

+-5.2%

$115,629 (2024) → $109,653 (2025)

San Francisco, CA

+35.9%

$104,360 (2019) → $141,780 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Hemet or San Francisco?

San Francisco has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $149,280/year, compared to Hemet at $115,454/year — a difference of $33,826 (29.30%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Hemet and San Francisco?

Hemet radiologic technologist and technicians earn $55.51/hr while San Francisco hygienists earn $71.78/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Hemet to San Francisco as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Hemet and San Francisco. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Hemet = $102,081, San Francisco = $129,120), job availability (14 vs 2,850 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Hemet vs San Francisco?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $78,779 in Hemet and $94,740 in San Francisco. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov