Radiography Tech Salary

Fresno vs Los Angeles: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Fresno, CA and Los Angeles, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Fresno, CA
$113,029
$54.34/hr
Los Angeles, CA
$113,745
$54.69/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFresno, CALos Angeles, CA
Median Salary$113,029$113,745
Hourly Rate$54.34$54.69
Entry Level (P10)$78,525$67,459
25th Percentile$90,613$91,992
75th Percentile$139,730$140,499
Top Earner (P90)$157,177$163,052
Total Employed7606,450
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Fresno ($113,029) and Los Angeles ($113,745) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.FresnoLos AngelesMedian Salary$113,029$113,745Entry Level (P10)$78,525$67,459Top Earner (P90)$157,177$163,052US Median $84,348

Verdict

Los Angeles, CA offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Fresno.

The salary gap between Fresno and Los Angeles is $716 (0.63%). Los Angeles's median is +34.85% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Fresno spans $78,652,Los Angeles spans $95,593. Los Angeles has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced radiologic technologist and technicians.

Fresno
P10 (Entry)$78,525
P25$90,613
Median$113,029
P75$139,730
P90 (Top)$157,177
Los Angeles
P10 (Entry)$67,459
P25$91,992
Median$113,745
P75$140,499
P90 (Top)$163,052

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Fresno ($110,641 effective) pays 10.47% more than Los Angeles ($100,158 effective).

Fresno
Nominal: $113,029
CoL Index: 102.158
Adjusted: $110,641
Los Angeles
Nominal: $113,745
CoL Index: 113.566
Adjusted: $100,158

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Fresno if…

  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $110,641)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Los Angeles if…

  • Higher median salary ($113,745/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($163,052)
  • Larger job market (6,450 employed)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Fresno grew 43.7% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 31.6% growth in Los Angeles over the same period.

Fresno, CA

+43.7%

$74,680 (2019) → $107,350 (2025)

Los Angeles, CA

+31.6%

$82,110 (2019) → $108,030 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Fresno or Los Angeles?

Los Angeles has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $113,745/year, compared to Fresno at $113,029/year — a difference of $716 (0.63%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Fresno and Los Angeles?

Fresno radiologic technologist and technicians earn $54.34/hr while Los Angeles hygienists earn $54.69/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Fresno to Los Angeles as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Fresno and Los Angeles. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Fresno = $110,641, Los Angeles = $100,158), job availability (760 vs 6,450 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Fresno vs Los Angeles?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $78,525 in Fresno and $67,459 in Los Angeles. The Fresno area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov