Radiography Tech Salary

Faribault vs Minneapolis: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Faribault, MN and Minneapolis, MN. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Faribault, MN
$78,481
$37.74/hr
Minneapolis, MN
$91,086
$43.79/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFaribault, MNMinneapolis, MN
Median Salary$78,481$91,086
Hourly Rate$37.74$43.79
Entry Level (P10)$55,965$75,398
25th Percentile$63,152$84,316
75th Percentile$95,917$106,501
Top Earner (P90)$111,781$112,871
Total Employed62,710
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Faribault ($78,481) and Minneapolis ($91,086) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.FaribaultMinneapolisMedian Salary$78,481$91,086Entry Level (P10)$55,965$75,398Top Earner (P90)$111,781$112,871US Median $84,348

Verdict

Minneapolis, MN offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Faribault.

The salary gap between Faribault and Minneapolis is $12,605 (16.06%). Minneapolis's median is +7.99% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Faribault spans $55,816,Minneapolis spans $37,473. Faribault has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Faribault
P10 (Entry)$55,965
P25$63,152
Median$78,481
P75$95,917
P90 (Top)$111,781
Minneapolis
P10 (Entry)$75,398
P25$84,316
Median$91,086
P75$106,501
P90 (Top)$112,871

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Minneapolis ($86,896 effective) pays 9.06% more than Faribault ($79,676 effective).

Faribault
Nominal: $78,481
CoL Index: 98.5
Adjusted: $79,676
Minneapolis
Nominal: $91,086
CoL Index: 104.822
Adjusted: $86,896

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Faribault if…

  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Choose Minneapolis if…

  • Higher median salary ($91,086/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($112,871)
  • Larger job market (2,710 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $86,896)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Faribault grew 5.4% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 26.1% growth in Minneapolis over the same period.

Faribault, MN

+5.4%

$70,715 (2024) → $74,538 (2025)

Minneapolis, MN

+26.1%

$68,610 (2019) → $86,510 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Faribault or Minneapolis?

Minneapolis has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $91,086/year, compared to Faribault at $78,481/year — a difference of $12,605 (16.06%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Faribault and Minneapolis?

Faribault radiologic technologist and technicians earn $37.74/hr while Minneapolis hygienists earn $43.79/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Faribault to Minneapolis as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Faribault and Minneapolis. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Faribault = $79,676, Minneapolis = $86,896), job availability (6 vs 2,710 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Faribault vs Minneapolis?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $55,965 in Faribault and $75,398 in Minneapolis. The Minneapolis area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov