Radiography Tech Salary

Cleburne vs San Antonio: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Cleburne, TX and San Antonio, TX. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Cleburne, TX
$76,209
$36.64/hr
San Antonio, TX
$82,200
$39.52/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCleburne, TXSan Antonio, TX
Median Salary$76,209$82,200
Hourly Rate$36.64$39.52
Entry Level (P10)$55,087$51,592
25th Percentile$62,218$66,227
75th Percentile$93,462$92,592
Top Earner (P90)$110,211$104,374
Total Employed71,630
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Cleburne ($76,209) and San Antonio ($82,200) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.CleburneSan AntonioMedian Salary$76,209$82,200Entry Level (P10)$55,087$51,592Top Earner (P90)$110,211$104,374US Median $84,348

Verdict

San Antonio, TX offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Cleburne.

The salary gap between Cleburne and San Antonio is $5,991 (7.86%). San Antonio's median is -2.55% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Cleburne spans $55,124,San Antonio spans $52,782. Cleburne has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Cleburne
P10 (Entry)$55,087
P25$62,218
Median$76,209
P75$93,462
P90 (Top)$110,211
San Antonio
P10 (Entry)$51,592
P25$66,227
Median$82,200
P75$92,592
P90 (Top)$104,374

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Antonio ($86,786 effective) pays 9.32% more than Cleburne ($79,384 effective).

Cleburne
Nominal: $76,209
CoL Index: 96
Adjusted: $79,384
San Antonio
Nominal: $82,200
CoL Index: 94.716
Adjusted: $86,786

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Cleburne if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($110,211)
  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Choose San Antonio if…

  • Higher median salary ($82,200/year)
  • Larger job market (1,630 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $86,786)
  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Cleburne grew 8.3% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 31.2% growth in San Antonio over the same period.

Cleburne, TX

+8.3%

$66,803 (2024) → $72,380 (2025)

San Antonio, TX

+31.2%

$59,500 (2020) → $78,070 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Cleburne or San Antonio?

San Antonio has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $82,200/year, compared to Cleburne at $76,209/year — a difference of $5,991 (7.86%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Cleburne and San Antonio?

Cleburne radiologic technologist and technicians earn $36.64/hr while San Antonio hygienists earn $39.52/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Cleburne to San Antonio as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Cleburne and San Antonio. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Cleburne = $79,384, San Antonio = $86,786), job availability (7 vs 1,630 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Cleburne vs San Antonio?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $55,087 in Cleburne and $51,592 in San Antonio. The Cleburne area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov