Radiography Tech Salary

Chicago vs Hanover Park: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Chicago, IL and Hanover Park, IL. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Chicago, IL
$86,485
$41.58/hr
Hanover Park, IL
$76,525
$36.79/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricChicago, ILHanover Park, IL
Median Salary$86,485$76,525
Hourly Rate$41.58$36.79
Entry Level (P10)$63,311$57,416
25th Percentile$71,534$63,967
75th Percentile$104,616$90,745
Top Earner (P90)$111,765$113,280
Total Employed5,6506
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Chicago ($86,485) and Hanover Park ($76,525) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.ChicagoHanover ParkMedian Salary$86,485$76,525Entry Level (P10)$63,311$57,416Top Earner (P90)$111,765$113,280US Median $84,348

Verdict

Chicago, IL offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Hanover Park.

The salary gap between Chicago and Hanover Park is $9,960 (13.02%). Chicago's median is +2.53% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Chicago spans $48,454,Hanover Park spans $55,864. Hanover Park has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced radiologic technologist and technicians.

Chicago
P10 (Entry)$63,311
P25$71,534
Median$86,485
P75$104,616
P90 (Top)$111,765
Hanover Park
P10 (Entry)$57,416
P25$63,967
Median$76,525
P75$90,745
P90 (Top)$113,280

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Chicago ($83,484 effective) pays 5.93% more than Hanover Park ($78,811 effective).

Chicago
Nominal: $86,485
CoL Index: 103.595
Adjusted: $83,484
Hanover Park
Nominal: $76,525
CoL Index: 97.1
Adjusted: $78,811

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Chicago if…

  • Higher median salary ($86,485/year)
  • Larger job market (5,650 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $83,484)
  • You prefer the Illinois area and lifestyle

Choose Hanover Park if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($113,280)
  • You prefer the Illinois area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Chicago grew 23.8% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 8.2% growth in Hanover Park over the same period.

Chicago, IL

+23.8%

$66,330 (2019) → $82,140 (2025)

Hanover Park, IL

+8.2%

$67,193 (2024) → $72,680 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Chicago or Hanover Park?

Chicago has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $86,485/year, compared to Hanover Park at $76,525/year — a difference of $9,960 (13.02%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Chicago and Hanover Park?

Chicago radiologic technologist and technicians earn $41.58/hr while Hanover Park hygienists earn $36.79/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Chicago to Hanover Park as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Chicago and Hanover Park. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Chicago = $83,484, Hanover Park = $78,811), job availability (5,650 vs 6 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Chicago vs Hanover Park?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $63,311 in Chicago and $57,416 in Hanover Park. The Chicago area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov