Radiography Tech Salary

Baltimore vs Cumberland: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Baltimore, MD and Cumberland, MD. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Baltimore, MD
$90,434
$43.47/hr
Cumberland, MD
$85,332
$41.02/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBaltimore, MDCumberland, MD
Median Salary$90,434$85,332
Hourly Rate$43.47$41.02
Entry Level (P10)$74,103$65,172
25th Percentile$85,011$71,808
75th Percentile$105,890$102,281
Top Earner (P90)$112,123$118,292
Total Employed1,6905
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Baltimore ($90,434) and Cumberland ($85,332) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.BaltimoreCumberlandMedian Salary$90,434$85,332Entry Level (P10)$74,103$65,172Top Earner (P90)$112,123$118,292US Median $84,348

Verdict

Baltimore, MD offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Cumberland.

The salary gap between Baltimore and Cumberland is $5,102 (5.98%). Baltimore's median is +7.22% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Baltimore spans $38,020,Cumberland spans $53,120. Cumberland has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced radiologic technologist and technicians.

Baltimore
P10 (Entry)$74,103
P25$85,011
Median$90,434
P75$105,890
P90 (Top)$112,123
Cumberland
P10 (Entry)$65,172
P25$71,808
Median$85,332
P75$102,281
P90 (Top)$118,292

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Baltimore ($86,550 effective) pays 10.86% more than Cumberland ($78,071 effective).

Baltimore
Nominal: $90,434
CoL Index: 104.487
Adjusted: $86,550
Cumberland
Nominal: $85,332
CoL Index: 109.3
Adjusted: $78,071

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Baltimore if…

  • Higher median salary ($90,434/year)
  • Larger job market (1,690 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $86,550)
  • You prefer the Maryland area and lifestyle

Choose Cumberland if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($118,292)
  • You prefer the Maryland area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Baltimore grew 28.2% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 53.1% growth in Cumberland over the same period.

Baltimore, MD

+28.2%

$67,020 (2019) → $85,890 (2025)

Cumberland, MD

+53.1%

$52,950 (2019) → $81,045 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Baltimore or Cumberland?

Baltimore has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $90,434/year, compared to Cumberland at $85,332/year — a difference of $5,102 (5.98%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Baltimore and Cumberland?

Baltimore radiologic technologist and technicians earn $43.47/hr while Cumberland hygienists earn $41.02/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Baltimore to Cumberland as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Baltimore and Cumberland. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Baltimore = $86,550, Cumberland = $78,071), job availability (1,690 vs 5 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Baltimore vs Cumberland?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $74,103 in Baltimore and $65,172 in Cumberland. The Baltimore area offers higher starting salaries.
JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov