Radiography Tech Salary

Baldwin Park vs San Francisco: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Baldwin Park, CA and San Francisco, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Baldwin Park, CA
$112,307
$53.99/hr
San Francisco, CA
$149,280
$71.78/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBaldwin Park, CASan Francisco, CA
Median Salary$112,307$149,280
Hourly Rate$53.99$71.78
Entry Level (P10)$80,542$94,740
25th Percentile$89,191$124,727
75th Percentile$138,777$178,582
Top Earner (P90)$165,658$186,153
Total Employed192,850
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Baldwin Park ($112,307) and San Francisco ($149,280) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.Baldwin ParkSan FranciscoMedian Salary$112,307$149,280Entry Level (P10)$80,542$94,740Top Earner (P90)$165,658$186,153US Median $84,348

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Baldwin Park.

The salary gap between Baldwin Park and San Francisco is $36,973 (32.92%). San Francisco's median is +76.98% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Baldwin Park spans $85,116,San Francisco spans $91,413. San Francisco has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced radiologic technologist and technicians.

Baldwin Park
P10 (Entry)$80,542
P25$89,191
Median$112,307
P75$138,777
P90 (Top)$165,658
San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$94,740
P25$124,727
Median$149,280
P75$178,582
P90 (Top)$186,153

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($129,120 effective) pays 30.03% more than Baldwin Park ($99,299 effective).

Baldwin Park
Nominal: $112,307
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $99,299
San Francisco
Nominal: $149,280
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $129,120

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Baldwin Park if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($149,280/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($186,153)
  • Larger job market (2,850 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $129,120)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Baldwin Park grew -5.2% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 35.9% growth in San Francisco over the same period.

Baldwin Park, CA

+-5.2%

$112,477 (2024) → $106,664 (2025)

San Francisco, CA

+35.9%

$104,360 (2019) → $141,780 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Baldwin Park or San Francisco?

San Francisco has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $149,280/year, compared to Baldwin Park at $112,307/year — a difference of $36,973 (32.92%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Baldwin Park and San Francisco?

Baldwin Park radiologic technologist and technicians earn $53.99/hr while San Francisco hygienists earn $71.78/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Baldwin Park to San Francisco as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Baldwin Park and San Francisco. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Baldwin Park = $99,299, San Francisco = $129,120), job availability (19 vs 2,850 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Baldwin Park vs San Francisco?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $80,542 in Baldwin Park and $94,740 in San Francisco. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov