Radiography Tech Salary

Attleboro vs Worcester: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Attleboro, MA and Worcester, MA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Attleboro, MA
$95,887
$46.10/hr
Worcester, MA
$108,543
$52.18/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAttleboro, MAWorcester, MA
Median Salary$95,887$108,543
Hourly Rate$46.10$52.18
Entry Level (P10)$70,462$82,969
25th Percentile$79,133$86,854
75th Percentile$118,455$129,401
Top Earner (P90)$140,082$132,592
Total Employed7610
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Attleboro ($95,887) and Worcester ($108,543) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.AttleboroWorcesterMedian Salary$95,887$108,543Entry Level (P10)$70,462$82,969Top Earner (P90)$140,082$132,592US Median $84,348

Verdict

Worcester, MA offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Attleboro.

The salary gap between Attleboro and Worcester is $12,656 (13.20%). Worcester's median is +28.68% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Attleboro spans $69,620,Worcester spans $49,623. Attleboro has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Attleboro
P10 (Entry)$70,462
P25$79,133
Median$95,887
P75$118,455
P90 (Top)$140,082
Worcester
P10 (Entry)$82,969
P25$86,854
Median$108,543
P75$129,401
P90 (Top)$132,592

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Worcester ($105,872 effective) pays 19.80% more than Attleboro ($88,375 effective).

Attleboro
Nominal: $95,887
CoL Index: 108.5
Adjusted: $88,375
Worcester
Nominal: $108,543
CoL Index: 102.523
Adjusted: $105,872

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Attleboro if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($140,082)
  • You prefer the Massachusetts area and lifestyle

Choose Worcester if…

  • Higher median salary ($108,543/year)
  • Larger job market (610 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $105,872)
  • You prefer the Massachusetts area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Attleboro grew 0.1% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 47.4% growth in Worcester over the same period.

Attleboro, MA

+0.1%

$90,960 (2024) → $91,069 (2025)

Worcester, MA

+47.4%

$69,940 (2019) → $103,090 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Attleboro or Worcester?

Worcester has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $108,543/year, compared to Attleboro at $95,887/year — a difference of $12,656 (13.20%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Attleboro and Worcester?

Attleboro radiologic technologist and technicians earn $46.10/hr while Worcester hygienists earn $52.18/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Attleboro to Worcester as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Attleboro and Worcester. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Attleboro = $88,375, Worcester = $105,872), job availability (7 vs 610 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Attleboro vs Worcester?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $70,462 in Attleboro and $82,969 in Worcester. The Worcester area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov