Radiography Tech Salary

Arvada vs Colorado Springs: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Arvada, CO and Colorado Springs, CO. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Arvada, CO
$93,084
$44.75/hr
Colorado Springs, CO
$91,044
$43.77/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricArvada, COColorado Springs, CO
Median Salary$93,084$91,044
Hourly Rate$44.75$43.77
Entry Level (P10)$67,106$66,807
25th Percentile$76,399$75,282
75th Percentile$113,723$107,343
Top Earner (P90)$136,297$114,892
Total Employed31520
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Arvada ($93,084) and Colorado Springs ($91,044) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.ArvadaColorado SpringsMedian Salary$93,084$91,044Entry Level (P10)$67,106$66,807Top Earner (P90)$136,297$114,892US Median $84,348

Verdict

Arvada, CO offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Colorado Springs.

The salary gap between Arvada and Colorado Springs is $2,040 (2.24%). Arvada's median is +10.36% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Arvada spans $69,191,Colorado Springs spans $48,085. Arvada has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Arvada
P10 (Entry)$67,106
P25$76,399
Median$93,084
P75$113,723
P90 (Top)$136,297
Colorado Springs
P10 (Entry)$66,807
P25$75,282
Median$91,044
P75$107,343
P90 (Top)$114,892

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Colorado Springs ($90,405 effective) pays 1.98% more than Arvada ($88,651 effective).

Arvada
Nominal: $93,084
CoL Index: 105
Adjusted: $88,651
Colorado Springs
Nominal: $91,044
CoL Index: 100.707
Adjusted: $90,405

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Arvada if…

  • Higher median salary ($93,084/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($136,297)
  • You prefer the Colorado area and lifestyle

Choose Colorado Springs if…

  • Larger job market (520 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $90,405)
  • You prefer the Colorado area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Arvada grew 5.4% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 38.4% growth in Colorado Springs over the same period.

Arvada, CO

+5.4%

$83,861 (2024) → $88,407 (2025)

Colorado Springs, CO

+38.4%

$62,470 (2019) → $86,470 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Arvada or Colorado Springs?

Arvada has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $93,084/year, compared to Colorado Springs at $91,044/year — a difference of $2,040 (2.24%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Arvada and Colorado Springs?

Arvada radiologic technologist and technicians earn $44.75/hr while Colorado Springs hygienists earn $43.77/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Arvada to Colorado Springs as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Arvada and Colorado Springs. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Arvada = $88,651, Colorado Springs = $90,405), job availability (31 vs 520 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Arvada vs Colorado Springs?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $67,106 in Arvada and $66,807 in Colorado Springs. The Arvada area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov