Radiography Tech Salary

Ann Arbor vs Ferndale: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Ann Arbor, MI and Ferndale, MI. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Ann Arbor, MI
$84,706
$40.73/hr
Ferndale, MI
$77,382
$37.20/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAnn Arbor, MIFerndale, MI
Median Salary$84,706$77,382
Hourly Rate$40.73$37.20
Entry Level (P10)$65,501$55,792
25th Percentile$69,165$62,712
75th Percentile$87,959$92,132
Top Earner (P90)$104,227$106,269
Total Employed6805
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Ann Arbor ($84,706) and Ferndale ($77,382) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.Ann ArborFerndaleMedian Salary$84,706$77,382Entry Level (P10)$65,501$55,792Top Earner (P90)$104,227$106,269US Median $84,348

Verdict

Ann Arbor, MI offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Ferndale.

The salary gap between Ann Arbor and Ferndale is $7,324 (9.46%). Ann Arbor's median is +0.42% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Ann Arbor spans $38,726,Ferndale spans $50,477. Ferndale has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced radiologic technologist and technicians.

Ann Arbor
P10 (Entry)$65,501
P25$69,165
Median$84,706
P75$87,959
P90 (Top)$104,227
Ferndale
P10 (Entry)$55,792
P25$62,712
Median$77,382
P75$92,132
P90 (Top)$106,269

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Ann Arbor ($83,967 effective) pays 1.13% more than Ferndale ($83,028 effective).

Ann Arbor
Nominal: $84,706
CoL Index: 100.88
Adjusted: $83,967
Ferndale
Nominal: $77,382
CoL Index: 93.2
Adjusted: $83,028

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Ann Arbor if…

  • Higher median salary ($84,706/year)
  • Larger job market (680 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $83,967)
  • You prefer the Michigan area and lifestyle

Choose Ferndale if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($106,269)
  • You prefer the Michigan area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Ann Arbor grew 32.1% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 22.2% growth in Ferndale over the same period.

Ann Arbor, MI

+32.1%

$60,910 (2019) → $80,450 (2025)

Ferndale, MI

+22.2%

$60,143 (2024) → $73,494 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Ann Arbor or Ferndale?

Ann Arbor has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $84,706/year, compared to Ferndale at $77,382/year — a difference of $7,324 (9.46%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Ann Arbor and Ferndale?

Ann Arbor radiologic technologist and technicians earn $40.73/hr while Ferndale hygienists earn $37.20/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Ann Arbor to Ferndale as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Ann Arbor and Ferndale. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Ann Arbor = $83,967, Ferndale = $83,028), job availability (680 vs 5 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Ann Arbor vs Ferndale?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $65,501 in Ann Arbor and $55,792 in Ferndale. The Ann Arbor area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov