Radiography Tech Salary

Ann Arbor vs Bay City: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Ann Arbor, MI and Bay City, MI. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Ann Arbor, MI
$84,706
$40.73/hr
Bay City, MI
$80,946
$38.92/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAnn Arbor, MIBay City, MI
Median Salary$84,706$80,946
Hourly Rate$40.73$38.92
Entry Level (P10)$65,501$58,404
25th Percentile$69,165$65,943
75th Percentile$87,959$97,357
Top Earner (P90)$104,227$114,222
Total Employed6808
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Ann Arbor ($84,706) and Bay City ($80,946) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.Ann ArborBay CityMedian Salary$84,706$80,946Entry Level (P10)$65,501$58,404Top Earner (P90)$104,227$114,222US Median $84,348

Verdict

Ann Arbor, MI offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Bay City.

The salary gap between Ann Arbor and Bay City is $3,760 (4.65%). Ann Arbor's median is +0.42% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Ann Arbor spans $38,726,Bay City spans $55,818. Bay City has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced radiologic technologist and technicians.

Ann Arbor
P10 (Entry)$65,501
P25$69,165
Median$84,706
P75$87,959
P90 (Top)$104,227
Bay City
P10 (Entry)$58,404
P25$65,943
Median$80,946
P75$97,357
P90 (Top)$114,222

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Bay City ($86,852 effective) pays 3.44% more than Ann Arbor ($83,967 effective).

Ann Arbor
Nominal: $84,706
CoL Index: 100.88
Adjusted: $83,967
Bay City
Nominal: $80,946
CoL Index: 93.2
Adjusted: $86,852

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Ann Arbor if…

  • Higher median salary ($84,706/year)
  • Larger job market (680 employed)
  • You prefer the Michigan area and lifestyle

Choose Bay City if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($114,222)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $86,852)
  • You prefer the Michigan area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Ann Arbor grew 32.1% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 22.2% growth in Bay City over the same period.

Ann Arbor, MI

+32.1%

$60,910 (2019) → $80,450 (2025)

Bay City, MI

+22.2%

$62,913 (2024) → $76,879 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Ann Arbor or Bay City?

Ann Arbor has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $84,706/year, compared to Bay City at $80,946/year — a difference of $3,760 (4.65%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Ann Arbor and Bay City?

Ann Arbor radiologic technologist and technicians earn $40.73/hr while Bay City hygienists earn $38.92/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Ann Arbor to Bay City as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Ann Arbor and Bay City. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Ann Arbor = $83,967, Bay City = $86,852), job availability (680 vs 8 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Ann Arbor vs Bay City?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $65,501 in Ann Arbor and $58,404 in Bay City. The Ann Arbor area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov